As one of the "trusted contributors" on /r/cybersecurity on Reddit.com, one of the FAQs was "Is my phone hacked with Pegasus? My (evil ex) is stalking me."
The answer is "extremely unlikely". Pegasus is reserved for nation-state actors because it costs a TON of money to license, so it's only deployed against mostly political people, or people with possibly high influence and wide reach, such as reporters. While Wired deployed sensational headlines "Spyware Scandals are Ripping Through Europe", and the verbiage was literally "commercial spyware has been deployed by more actors against a wider range of victims", implying that even normal citizens can be targeted by commercial spyware, the literally truth is, again, only people of high influence (politicians and reporters) are being targeted, i.e. "prevailing narrative has still been that the malware is used in targeted attacks against an extremely small number of people", even though the article was stating that literally despite trying to claim the opposite. Yes, Pegasus, developed by NSO Group, is getting some competition in Europe, where OTHER companies are developing similar spyware... with similar price tags.
The article in question "$1 phone scanner finds seven Pegasus spyware infections" basically states that iVerify has managed to develope a tool to detect Pegasus and other commercial spyware. It sold $1 trial package called "IVerify Basics", and if the user choose to turn on Spyware Detection, they can generate a fingerprint to be submitted to iVerify for analysis, and 2500 or so people have done so. Out of the 2500, they found SEVEN instances of Pegasus infection. According to iVerify, "people who were targeted were not just journalists and activists, but business leaders, people running commercial enterprises, people in government positions", even though in the next paragraphs, they pointed to a Sikh political activist (and a lawyer) as one of the iVerify successful detections. They also pointed out that two of Harris-Walz staff's phones were infected.
The article concludes with "the rate (of spyware infection) is much higher than the prevailing narrative". Yes, it is much higher, but the original number was such an infinitisimally small number, even if it's 10-100x higher, it STILL a tiny number of users being targeted. Important people... Business leaders, CEO, Company Presidents, government employees, political employees, etc. in addition to the typical reporters and political activists.
Not average citizens on the streets.